American blunder

Home 

September 7, 2004

Psychological fear

In an article published by Czech newspaper

Mlada Fronta [the equivalent of Russian Pravda]

on 06-12-2004 the headline said it directly:

"Peace is a threat for the future"

The author Zdenek Svacha was very specific

about what he meant.

"Seemingly everlasting peace is leading us on the path of loosing our sense of importance, and is turning us to selfishness and moral apathy. The longer we will have peace as this one the worse will the following war turn out for us."

The situation in Russia is not any better, on the contrary "terrorism" is spreading in a country that founded this evil tool of tyranny in the first place.

We will address this issue but first

let us consider the following:

In his brilliant analysis, U.S. Government researcher Dr. Joseph D. Douglass Jr. presents the chilling history of communism, and its use of terrorist methods and means to undermine the one thing communists hate the most - our freedom:

"Today's international terrorism is fundamentally the product of Russia's military intelligence, the GRU, and to a lesser extent its civilian intelligence, the KGB. Both the KGB and GRU are alive, well and more powerful today than they were under Communism.

 

Further, the greatest sources of potential weapons of mass destruction, missiles and submarine proliferation over the past decade have been the various Russian laboratories and organizations (e.g., military and intelligence)."   

When recently Russia exploded with violence

one has to ask a legitimate question:

How is it possible that country like Russia that had such ties with Islamic terrorists [as for example

the PLO, Hamas and so on] is now for some

"un-expected reason" their target while Russian weapons, intelligence and know-how is still freely floating into the hands of Al Qaeda and related terrorist entities ?

And since the whole reason America has been attacked on 9/11 is claimed to be religious Islamic hatred, what about Russia with most of her population totally atheist ?

How about that Mr. Putin ? After the last week's hostage stand off in city of Beslan has ended the following report was issued:

Russian Deputy Prosecutor Sergei Fridinsky told reporters that 322 victims were killed, as well as all 26 militants involved in the seizure of the school. That raised the death toll well beyond the 250 officials had previously cited.

The same has happened in the last year Moscow Theatre attack and all terrorists were killed without Russian special anti-terrorist unit considering capturing at least one of the Chechen terrorists alive for the obvious purpose of interrogation to simply find out where the others could be hiding, where is the supply of weapons coming from and where are they being stored and so on.

The recent hostage crisis in Beslan was also claimed, as well as the Moscow attack, by Shamil Basayev's group of Chechen separatists. Some connection to Al Qaeda was "conveniently" cited by the Russian side but it remained however unconfirmed.

Analysis of the facts

First it is necessary to explain what it means to be a trained communist paratrooper.

I have served in Czechoslovak communist Air Force and our detachment was supplying services to our pilots' training programs as we were part of a pilot training aviation college based out of city of Kosice in Eastern Slovakia. The regiment's code was VU 1105.

We have also trained people from Libya and possibly Angola, that was the talk among enlisted soldiers as I was one myself. I have personally seen black African man in Czechoslovak lieutenant's uniform and had to salute him as our path had crossed one time, clearly by accident as these people were kept under strict separation from us, the ordinary soldiers.

The man couldn't speak a word of Czech, he didn't even know how to salute back to me.

The special forces paratroopers were always only committed communists, handpicked and carefully selected, trained always separately from the rest

of the military units.   

These were the special forces, the best trained men of the communist military, always poised to attack the capitalists on moment's notice, just give us the orders comrade commander and we do the damage to the imperialist dogs.

Well, Shamil Basayev has a very interesting past indeed. He also was a communist paratrooper, that is he served in Red Army Special Forces.

The problem with the whole thing about Basayev is clearly this :  Since Basayev has received the best training possible a communist soldier can receive, and since part of that training was also Marxist-Leninist indoctrination lessons as I clearly remember we were ordered to undergo such lessons every week during my 2 year draft, what was the exact situation in Red Army ?

This evil communist war machine was one hardened communist after another and no religion was ever permitted to "soil" the ranks of this tool of communist World domination ambitions.

Such breach of ideological clarity of the squad was not only punishable by death from the firing squad, but the level of determination to serve the communist cause has been so high that any possibility of anybody from such highly trained unit turning into for example Islamic separatist is totally out of question. How is it therefore possible that Basayev has turned into "born again Muslim" practically overnight ?

There is of course another part of this problem with Basayev and his group of "Chechen Rebels".

If they have such highly trained leader we can safely assume that they themselves are also trained in paramilitary operations. Now why is it that so far this groups' targets were only civilian and not at all any Russian military or government targets - not even one of them ?

Since we have heard for some years now that Russian military is in deep trouble, that Russian officers are selling weapons [including nuclear weapons] to terrorists, that people like "former" KGB officer Victor Bout is able to lay his hands on some 40 giant Antonov military cargo planes without the Russian government's blink of an eye, how is it therefore possible that this group of Chechen separatists hasn't even try to attack any of the Russian military bases if these bases have such bad security ?

Of course, as usual, since this issue would obviously come up, Russians have spread a rumor through Gorbachov that the problem with bad security

on Russian military bases is not accurate information and that there is no possibility, according to Gorbachov again, that Russian military officers would be able to sell anything to terrorists.

So what is it then ?

The flip-flop came at the time when Russian security measures were questioned and after several publications including the 1999 book The New Jackals written by British terrorism expert Simon Reeve have surfaced and brought some shed of light to this problem of Russian [un]-security. Soviet [pardon me Russian] deception game is in play.

According to this important book :

[Page 215]

Reports emerging from Israel and Russia suggest that bin Laden gave his contacts in the Chechen Mafia several millions of dollars in cash, and heroin with street value of more than US $ 500 million; in exchange the Chechens launched an all-out campaign to obtain 'nuclear suitcase' bombs for Al Qaeda.

 

[Page 216]

Because the Chechens need bin Laden to facilitate their drug deals with the Taliban leadership, they are extremely unlikely to have accepted the money and his heroin if they were unable to supply the suitcase bombs. According to one senior American intelligence source close to America's bin Laden investigation, officials from Al Qaeda, or possibly senior members of Taliban, obtained several of the nuclear suitcase bombs in the autumn of 1998 and transferred them into storage in the Taliban's main secure complex near Kandahar in Afghanistan.

 

There appears to be some confusion, however, within the intelligence community over whether the bombs are still programmed with a Soviet-era coding system, that requires a signal from Moscow before detonation is possible.

 

The Russian government refuses to comment on the allegations, but by early 1999 there were strong rumours in the Central Asian states that Chechen rebels [in this case the Mafia] were hoping to recruit former Soviet Special Forces. It is possible Al Qaeda or the Taliban need these recruits to explain and work the coded control system of the suitcase bombs.

 

What has always puzzled me was the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980's. Why was it that the USSR sent her Red Army to such poor Central Asian country.

There is nothing of value there and still Soviets took their time and energy to conquer Afghanistan and installed the pro-Moscow communist government of Babrak Karmal in Kabul.

Then precisely at the time when Gorbachov has entered the stage with Perestroika, Kremlin has withdrawn his, till then undefeated, Red Army from Afghanistan and since then we only hear that Russians have lost the war there. Red Army, fully equipped and highly trained has lost to Afghan horse-back riders ?

Does this make sense to anyone ?

No, it doesn't.

It is obvious that Moscow wanted to occupy

a poor country like Afghanistan that would later

become Moscow's terrorist staging ground. Taliban's Islamist fanatical tyrannical rule would be the security that Russia could never be seen behind any "Islamic terrorist" operations including the 9/11 attack on America.

The Islamic religion angle had to be maintained

for the reason that Moscow, now claiming to be democratic country and America's "strategic ally"

in the War on Terror, had to remain un-noticed as the main culprit and mastermind behind the Islamic terror and its operations.

In such case would anyone be surprised that Putin

and company would go so far that their own citizens, including children, get killed ?

How much the Western World

knows about communism anyway ?

I'd say nothing.

We take communists as equal when they are not equal to freedom and God loving people because communists have criminal evil mind and that allows them to murder their own citizens without a blink of an eye - as long as the deception and strategic advancement plan goes forward.

The false collapse of communism has been acknowledged by people like Gorbachov

[indirectly that is] when comrade Gorby

has said the following :

"SDI (Reagan's Star Wars program) was not decisive in our movement toward a new relationship with the West. If you accept that reforms in the Soviet Union started under pressure from the West, particularly as a result of the implementation of SDI, that would distort the real picture and offer a wrong lesson for the future.

"Of decisive importance were the changes within the Soviet Union. They necessarily preceded any change in our external relations. We had to go a long way from

a critical reassessment of the Communist model that was forcibly imposed on our country and that was sustained by repressive measures.

With technological progress and the improvement of the educational and cultural level, the old system began to be rejected by people who saw that their initiative was suppressed, who saw they were not able to realize their potential.

One thing comes to mind while reading this obvious [underlined] lie from the mouth of a communist, whose mentor was none other than the feared KGB Boss Yuri Andropov himself.

In my last week opinion I explained how the whole collapse of communism was orchestrated by Moscow and it is a long-term Russian communist fraud.

Therefore it is only logical to assume that any related Kremlin's "activities" would be of suspicious character and that the relationship between Russia and Islamic terrorists, based on the fact, that they [terrorists] are still getting weapons of various kind and of Russian origin, that Moscow is running the Islamic terrorism show all along.

Now why would they do that, since they claim their [communist] system of government has collapsed, as Gorby has put it - their own [oppressed] people have forced the commies to "close the shop", without a fight, and make friends with the hated capitalists.

What have we got here ?

The whole saga took on another dimension when Mr. KGB lieutenant colonel Vladimir Putin claimed that mid-level officials in the U.S. government were undermining his country's war on terrorism by supporting Chechen separatists, whom he compared

to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, one report has said.

Is it possible that Russia is playing the whole charade of her own "terrorist problem" in order to start something America has considered for some 15 years as a thing of the dark past ?

Is it possible, that Russia is setting us up by blaming America for something we haven't done, and by creating the obvious anti-American sentiment and outright hatred in hearths and minds of Russian and [Eastern and also Western] European people ?

You know that Europe doesn't like us very much,

don't you ?

Is it possible, that we are being set up for a long-term bloody and all-out nuclear conflict,  that communism has stored for us in it's rear pantry for the last 15 years of pretended friendship and "strategic partnership" ?

History teaches us again, over and over.

I find some amazing similarities between

this possible scenario of Russia and

the Nazi Germany: