inside the Vatican
Page 1
July 24, 2006
A note to sedevacantists [Please read first].
"What Our Lady wants is that the Pope and all the Bishops
in the world shall consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart
on one special day.
If this is done, she will convert Russia and there will be peace.
If it is not done, the errors of Russia will spread through every
country in the world."
"Does this mean, in your opinion, that every country,
without exception, will be overcome by Communism ?
"Yes."
[Sister Lucia dos Santos, one of the 3 children to whom Our Lady the Blessed Virgin Mary
appeared in Fatima, Portugal, in 1917, in an interview with William Thomas Walsh, "Our
Lady of Fatima" book, page 222, Doubleday Publishing, New York, NY 1954].
It is not easy to go through with such a difficult subject, a subject which is
specially dealing with the situation within the Novus Ordo Catholic Church
of today [1], but we have to keep in mind that what is even more important is
the salvation of souls for God, which can only be accomplished through the
Catholic Apostolic Faith and none other.
The question is:
Is the Catholic Faith manifested in, protected and safeguarded
by the Church after the Second Vatican Council ?
The obvious answer is no !
This is a fact, but we have to also ask ourselves who is the imminent
beneficiary of such horrible changes within the Church, and why these
changes were accepted, allowed and implemented by the very people who
are suppose to serve God and protect His flock on Earth ?
The answer is again obvious and absolutely clear - the main beneficiary of
these Modernist changes within the Church are Russian communists and
their Perestroika world-wide communist slavery scheme. Without such
perversion of the Church, which only makes people loose their true Faith,
which in its traditional form, as given to us by Our Lord Jesus Christ
Himself, this Catholic Faith safeguards the faithful against all enemies of
Christ, the communist takeover of the World wouldn't be possible and every
deceptive scheme of the Russian communist criminals would be rejected up
front.
So this had to be avoided at all cost by the already highly experienced Soviet
[Russian] communist strategy - and they had to have help to achieve this evil
scheme from the inside of the Vatican. No other possibility [less radical
perhaps] makes sense.....
The Vatican-Moscow Pact
The question is:
Since this extremely important 1963 agreement, important for the
protection, execution and imposition, upon the unwitting World, of all
Russian communist interests, evil schemes and plans [which are clear and
have never changed], has been proposed on the premise that the "dialog"
will succeed with the Russian KGB Orthodox schismatics, would these
Russian communist criminals go into such to them essential agreement
without having their agents on both sides - to make sure that the agreement
would be signed and entirely in the communists' favor ?
We have to look at the situation from the point of view of the Russian
communist criminal mind - this in fact is essential and clearly omitted by
many analysts, because this way we will recognize what their evil intentions
were and what evil fruits were also produced by those within the Vatican
who enabled it.
Fr. Malachi Martin in his book The Jesuits (on pages 85-86)
[.....]in the late spring of 1962, a certain Eugene Cardinal Tisserant had been dispatched by Pope John XXIII to meet with a Russian prelate, one Metropolitan Nikodim, representing the Soviet Politburo of Premier Nikita Khrushchev.
Pope John ardently desired to know if the Soviet Government would allow two members of the Russian Orthodox Church to attend the Second Vatican Council set to open the following October.
The meeting between Tisserant and Nikodim took place in the official residence of Paul Joseph Schmitt, then the bishop of Metz, France. There, Nikodim gave the Soviet answer.
His government would agree, provided the Pope would guarantee two things: that his forthcoming Council would issue no condemnation of Soviet Communism or of Marxism, and that the Holy See would make it a rule for the future to abstain from all such official condemnation.
Nikodim got his guarantees.
Matters were orchestrated after that for Pope John by Jesuit Cardinal Augustine Bea until the final agreement was concluded in Moscow, and was carried out in Rome, in that Vatican Council as well as in the policies of the Holy See for nearly two decades since.
What more can be said ? It is absolutely clear that it was the Pope John XXIII
himself who desired that the Church would "open the doors to dialog" - but
a dialog with the communist murderers who will stop at nothing to enslave
the World and destroy the Catholic Faith at all cost ?
It was John XXIII who, contrary to the clear teaching of Pius XI and Pius XII,
dared to accept the communist murderers as equal to the Mystical Body of
Christ - and as Our Lord says: "....by their fruits you shall know them....." -
the same can not only be applied to the Russian communists, but also to the
Pope John and his Modernist [and disguised communist] followers.
Before readers start jumping up and down how dare I insult the Pope, I'd
like to present more facts. It is absolutely certain that the Russian KGB
sought any compromising information on various Vatican clergymen in
order to use such data for blackmail and subsequent recruitment and
takeover of the Church. If people deny this factum then they know nothing
about communist methods of subversion.
As it was stated by
Czechoslovak Gen. Jan Sejna, publishedin the book Red Cocaine, the drugging of America written by
Dr. Joseph D. Douglass Jr., the following is of great importance:
Overall, the principal directions of Soviet activity directed against
religions were [still are - editor's note] as follows:
1) To encourage leading religious centers to supportthe Soviet policy of peaceful coexistence.
-----
4) Through propaganda and deception, to show that socialism is
allied with religious groups in the 'fight' for better life generally.
5) To use religious groups to exploit and further disarmament -that is, to exploit the idea that it is against the will of God to kill
people.
-----7)To infiltrate the religious centers with the following
order of priority:
The Vatican.
Moslems.
Jews.
Buddhists.
Reactionary sects.
In regards to 'reactionary sects', Czechoslovak [communist]intelligence had three clerical agents within the Vatican in the
late 1960s. They were located, Sejna asserted, within the sections
responsible for foreign policy, finance and ideology. [2]
As it has been reported by Tradition in Action, it is also clear and
documented that the young priest Angelo Roncalli [later John XXIII ]
had an open admiration for the Italian Modernist Ernesto Bonaiuti.
In fact during the Pontificate of Pius XII, it was then Patriarch
of Venice Roncalli who sided with the local communist union
against the Italian Government [!!!!], which at the time was an
excommunicable offense - Pius XII decree - to be a member of
the communist party or to do ANY work for the communist party,
including support of any kind.
This information was published, it is a very famous case.
After he was elected Pope, John XXIII said: “Communism is an enemy
of the Church, but the Church does not have enemies.”
In the book "The Liturgical Movement" written by Rev. Father Didier
Bonneterre we can read on page 34 the following:
There was already, therefore, in Paris quite a number of avant-
garde clergy much occupied with Catholic Action who were
strongly taken by Dom Beauduin's thoughts on liturgical
ecumenism.
This clergy grouped about Msgr. Chevrot, the influential
curé of St. Francis Xavier, [who] was also very involved
with the Resistance and got to know numerous Communist
party militants who had suddenly become patriots.
The influence that the "Maquis" (French Resistance movement)
had over a generation of young clergy was considerable, and in
many cases it was far from beneficial.
This whole evolution towards socialism took place during the
episcopates of Cardinals Verdier and Suhard, whose dominant
qualities were certainly neither vigilance nor lucidity.
So who was this monk Dom Beauduin ?
He was one of the masterminds behind the liturgical Modernist movement,
and he was also extremely involved in a liturgical ecumenism with "other
religions".
This book is so remarkable, it shows details of the times of these perverting
changes within the Catholic Church and the connections of these people
which are of course not at all surprising today - based on the fruits they
produced - and remember again who the sole beneficiary is.....
Dom Beauduin stated after the death of Pope Pius XII:
[The author is quoting the book "Dom Lambert Beauduin" of another
Modernist promoter Fr. Louis Bouyer [former Protestant theology student,
influenced by Auguste Lecerf (Calvinist), Oscar Cullman (Lutheran) and
Sergei Bulgakov (Russian Orthodox) on page 78 (The Liturgical Movement)]:
"If they elect Roncalli, " he said "all will be saved.
He will be capable of calling a Council and canonizing
ecumenism....."
Silence fell, then, with a return of his old mischievousness,
he said with flashing eyes:
"I believe we have a good chance. Most of the cardinals
are not sure what to do. They are capable of voting for him."
----
The reader will remember that Msgr. Roncalli and Dom Lambert
Beauduin had been friends since 1924.
----
Page 79:
Dom Beauduin was well acquainted with John XXIII.
As early as 1958 he recognized that he would canonize
ecumenism and call a Council, a Council that would be a
synthesis of Dom Beauduin's entire work, a synthesis of the
"Ecumenical Movement" and the "Liturgical Movement".
It is of no surprise also that this influence and contacts of Dom Beauduin
were extended to Msgr. Bugnini and Msgr. Montini, who later became the
Pope Paul VI [and his "mass" and deeds of "dialog" shows the fruits
again......and the beneficiaries ......].
Notes:
[1] We cannot emphasize enough that one has to protect the Catholic Faith
and even be ready to die for Our Lord if necessary - and many examples of
the Catholic martyrs are witness to this understanding. Those who allow
themselves, after reading this analysis, to be in the state of despair, such
people should resolve to prayer and more fervor in the service to Our Lord.
We have to follow the Catholic tradition because it is sacred, comes from
Jesus Christ and His Mystical Body the Catholic Church [not the Modernist
version] and cannot be substituted on the premise of "opening the doors to
the World"........
One has to pray the original Pope Leo XIII St. Michael the Archangel prayer
[which is today forbidden to pray by the Vatican Modernists - and they know
very well why they made it so], to ask for help and to receive it.....
Excellent information about the Vatican II Modernist errors
can be found here.
[2] It was Gen. Jan Sejna who also had first hand knowledge about the Soviet
operations against the Vatican. I have long weighed whether to post this data
I have received from my sources, who were familiar with Gen. Sejna's work.
It is not easy to post but I simply have no choice:
In response to one of my e-mails, which explained the situation
within the Church today, the source replied:
Incidentally, Jan Sejna told me on two occasions that either a
Czech or KGB intelligence guy remarked one time before JP2 was
JP2 that "We need more people like JP2" , (using his real name at
the time of course, which I keep forgetting).
When we put together the false proclamations of the Vatican that
communism is dead today, and also the scandals, like the one in Assisi,
we cannot doubt this extremely important note on John Paul II.
....by their fruits.......