Distributism - give,

OR else.....!

Home

Back to How they did it - Part 3

 

Distributism is a quick-sand type project, the name suggests, and it means that if accepted, it will take you down and your property will disappear from you in a jiffy.

This is what the leading circles of distributism don't claim, they are very careful in presenting "their" idea to the World, as it is essential not to spill the beans before the property is taken away from us.

In fact the distributism teaching is nothing else but preparation of unsuspected souls for the communist takeover of the World. As unbelievable as it may sound, the people who are aware of the brutal and evil potential of communism, those are to be soften by this idea of taking from the "evil capitalists and corporations" and to "spread the property among everybody".

 

In his work "What is distributism" one of the supporters of distributism Mr. Thomas Storck explains:

 

Distributism is nothing more than an economic system in which private property is well distributed, in which "as many people as possible" are in fact owners. Probably the most complete statement of distributism can be found in Hilaire Belloc's book, The Restoration of Property (1936). Note the title, The Restoration of Property. For the distributists argued that under capitalism property, certainly productive property, was the preserve of the rich, and that this gave them an influence and power in society far beyond what they had any right to. Yes, the formal right to private property exists for all under capitalism, but in practice it is restricted to the rich.

 

The envy is visible, for it is this "urge to change things" that keeps the distributists going, which is again very much comparable to the Marxists of the 19th and 20th centuries. These people won't simply stop, they don't care what you, in their view simple minded, people think. They want their distributism implemented.

 

 

Soviet [Russian] strategy to destroy capitalism

 

It is very clear that communists have to disguise their ideological goals and strategies into more "acceptable" forms. The target people are always those

who oppose [actively] communism as such, people who stand firm in their

anti-communist beliefs but who don't understand fully the dialectical potential

of communism.

 

Such enemies of communism have to be dealt with on their own ground, in their own terms, and without mercy. It is therefore of no surprise that according to testimonies of defectors from communism, namely Czechoslovak General Jan Sejna, the Soviet policy of destroying capitalism through such clandestine operations has been implemented.

 

The systematic undermining of capitalism as "the evil force behind all World's suffering" is one of the many strategies the KGB and sister services were studying, testing and putting in place.

 

In his brilliant book Red Cocaine, based on the testimony of Czechoslovak

defector General Jan Sejna, the author Dr. Joseph D. Douglass Jr. pointed out

to the following:

 

Overall, the principal directions of Soviet activity directed against religions were [still are - editor's note] as follows:

------------

2) To compel leading religious groups to deny their support for capitalism and to promote the idea that the rich countries must help the poor countries.
 

3) To support desired political, social and economic changes which will bring the Communists to power in the various targeted countries.

4) Through propaganda and deception, to show that socialism is allied with religious groups in the 'fight' for better life generally.

5) To use religious groups to exploit and further disarmament - that is, to exploit the idea that it is against the will of God to kill people.

 

6) To build a mass psychological perception of nuclear warfare as signifying the end of the World.

 

[Ed. note - it is a very well known fact that almost all western European and American anti-war protest groups were during the openly communist era linked to either Moscow run communist parties and or KGB front groups..... and of course other communist states, as for example North Korea and Cuba are being still used to channel money and directives for such groups today.....].

In this Soviet [Russian] communist strategy all of the background of distributism

is laid. It is to attack the minds of religious people [in this case Catholics] and to sway them into envy, into hate, into sin by "showing them new possibilities". 

The always out of context taken Papal encyclicals and writings about "social justice" are of course being used by these distributists as examples of Papal O.K. [non-existent] for distributism, never of course showing the true context of such works.....  Coincidence ?

 

But to change somebody's mind people have to cover their tracks and pretend

to be as religious as possible, they often use nicely sounding slogans and words, they often carve "new ideas" and present them as traditional. But in reality it is the tradition, the teaching of Jesus Christ Our Lord and Savior that these distributists are after. One has to look very carefully to recognize the hidden agenda behind these distributist "social teachings".....

 

It is of no surprise that one of the leading people of the distributist crowd is

British national Derek Holland. The following biography shows the facts:

 

Derek Holland is a figure on the British far-right. Initially a member of the National Front Holland became one of the leading lights on the Political Soldier wing of the party when his pamphlet The Political Soldier was published in 1984. In 1989 Holland broke with Patrick Harrington and followed Nick Griffin into the International Third Position (ITP).

Holland injected his sympathies for radical Islamic groups, as part of his quasi-religious nationalist philosophy, into the ITP.

 

He supported the ideas of Muammar al-Qaddafi and Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

 

In 1988 he traveled to Libya as an official representative of the NF.

Along with Italian fascist Roberto Fiore, Holland was involved in the creation of a Catholic charity in the 1990s called the St. George Educational Trust.

Holland's last public appearance was at a Swedish nationalist convention in 2002 (hosted by Nationaldemokratisk Ungdom).

Since that time the ITP appears to have gravitated towards the europeannationalfront.net and Holland has retired from active involvement in neo-fascism, though his Political Soldier writings are still circulated amongst radical nationalists.

 

So the ideas are no longer Catholic, as it seems to be presented, but in fact reactionary socialist, which in fact is only playing into the hands of the always

in background present Moscow communists. The apparent parallel between their strategy and Derek Holland and his pretended Catholic friends' distributist ideas are clear. This is of course not enough to paint somebody as who he may be,

but let us look at the background of Holland's Libyan connections.

 

 

KGB-GRU, or who then .....?

 

Not to be accused of sidetracking but we have to look at the background of the Libyan terrorist Muomar Qaddafi. It is essential to understand how the Soviet

[now Russian] strategy to discredit capitalism worldwide is being spread among the trusted servants for furtherance elsewhere.....

 

In the Front Page Magazine interview with the former chief of Securitate Romanian communist espionage service Mr. Ion Mihai Pacepa we can read the following:

 

In the early 1970s, the Kremlin established a “socialist division of labor” for persuading the governments of Iraq and Libya to join the terrorist war against the US. KGB chairman Yury Andropov (who would later become the leader of the Soviet Union), told me that either of those two countries could inflict more damage on the Americans than could the [Czechoslovak STB trained - ed. note] Red Brigades, the Baader-Meinhof group and all other terrorist organizations taken together.

 

The governments of those Arab countries, Andropov explained, not only had inexhaustible financial resources (read: oil), but they also had huge intelligence services that were being run by “our razvedka [ed. note - espionage] advisers” and could extend their tentacles to every corner of the earth.

 

[Ed. note - this is extremely important statement from Pacepa - and clearly coming from a defector who was inside the Soviet decision-making circles. This means that ANY Soviet and now Russian operations are being disguised as coming from Libya, Iraq, Syria, Iran, North Korea, Cuba and any other already KNOWN supporter of terrorism. Such operations can of course include anything Moscow desires.....]

 

There was one major danger, though: by raising terrorism to the state level we risked American reprisal. Washington would never dispatch its airplanes and rockets to exterminate the Baader-Meinhof, but it might well deploy them to destroy a terrorist state. We therefore were also tasked to provide those countries secretly with weapons of mass destruction, because Andropov concluded that the Yankees would never attack a country that could retaliate with such deadly weapons.

Libya was Romania’s main client in that socialist division of labor, because of Ceausescu’s close association with Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. Moscow kept Iraq. Andropov told me that, if our Iraq and Libyan experiment proved successful, the same strategy would be extended to Syria.

 

So the association of Mr. Holland to Qaddafi can be of course seen in reverse.

No doubts about that, based on the fact that it is Mr. Holland himself who promotes the Libyan propaganda [and Soviet at the time as well] that the 1988 Pan Am flight 103 bombing was NOT work of Qaddafi and his espionage service.  Again, is this coincidence ?

 

By the way, it is not a coincidence that the plastic explosive used during this

anti-American act of terrorism was Czechoslovak made SEMTEX, which is the

only known plastic explosive in the World that doesn't leave any traces. Czechoslovak communists supplied this highly destructive explosive to

Qaddafi and also to the Arafat's PLO in tons ! The communist connection

to such bombing of American airliner is again not a surprise and Derek Holland's denial of Qaddafi's men involvement is of course not surprising either.......

 

But what is even more important is the fact why would Qaddafi, who is known to be paranoid about his safety and keeps extremely tight security around him, why would he allow some un-known British national to come to Qaddafi's palace for an audience ?

 

Who set it all up and why ?

 

Qaddafi doesn't give audience just to anybody unless he is asked to do

so by certain people. The background of such connections is again visible.

 

And so we can of course see other "true" statements of Mr. Holland and

published on websites he's associated with, as for example:

 

WHY PATRIOTS SHOULD OPPOSE THE WAR

TEN GOOD REASONS NOT TO TRUST BUSH AND BLAIR...

1. The “evidence” against Bin Laden has not been presented to the world. The Afghans said they would, if shown the “evidence”, hand over Bin Laden to a neutral country for trial — hardly an unreasonable position.

2. The Americans threatened Libya with violence if they didn’t hand over the ‘Lockerbie suspects’ - one of whom is now in jail. Many experts - and families of the victims - now realise that both Libyans are innocent.

3. Bin Laden was originally funded by the CIA - using American tax-payers’ money.

4. Since “banning” assassination attempts in 1976, America has attempted the assassination of foreign heads of state at least 25 times.

5. The British Secret Services funded Muslim extremists in an attempt to murder Libya’s Colonel Gaddaffy. They failed, but killed innocents in the process.

6. The war against Afghanistan will not stop Islamic fundamentalists, but it will act as a recruiting sergeant for them.

7. Whilst America and Britain always engage in sabre rattling against Arab States “condemned” by UN resolutions, Israel continues to ignore many UN resolutions on human rights, land occupation, torture and aggression. Furthermore, Israel continues to get massive ‘Western’ funding, military hardware and intelligence aid.

8. Whilst Blair and Co. continue to target potential enemies of Israel on a “divide and rule” basis, they positively assist the Islamisation of Europe through immigration — a far greater threat to our survival than Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Iran or Libya.

9. Those who oppose the Islamisation of Europe, thanks to Blair, will now face prison if they dare to speak out, a flagrant attack on freedom of speech.

10. Is the death of one British soldier or one innocent Afghan and the wasting of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money, merely to create more Islamic fundamentalists, worth it?

BRING OUR TROOPS HOME, AND REPATRIATE THE ASIANS
 

It is always the anti-war sentiment that such people bring to the table but that is just to show their association with the above mentioned Soviet policies to use religions to facilitate such ideas and implant them into minds and hearts of Christians. The idea is to manage-control such people into accepting the disguised communism as the only savior of mankind while the "evil capitalists" are all out to "destroy it"......

 

One has to ask what is it that communism [disguised in any shape or form] could ever offer besides murdering the millions of innocent and oppressing the weak ?

 

 

American connections

 

One of Holland's connections in America is John F. Sharpe, founder of IHS Press. 

It is also important to notice about Mr. Sharpe's anti-war stand, which can be clearly seen in his publication Neo-Conned! Again : Hypocrisy, Lawlessness, and the Rape of Iraq.

 

It is of a great surprise that Mr. Sharpe is also listed in the U.S. Navy,

ph. # 703-692-9046, 222-9046 Sharpe, John F. LCDR, OI-52 D in the Navy Public Affairs directory

 

But the Sharpe-Holland connection is of course also very interesting. Till recently [or perhaps still today .... under alias perhaps .... ?] Mr. Sharpe had Derek Holland on his IHS Press Board of Directors !

 

That alone is very important fact and we can safely ask a question:

Can a U.S. Navy officer be connected to such known anti-American pro-fascist person as Holland, who has ties to known terrorists ?

 

What is behind this connection ? Shouldn't the Navy investigate Sharpe for connection to a person with known ties to Libyan leader and pro-Moscow terrorist thug Qaddafi ? Isn't the Navy aware of such connections and anti-American and anti-war stands of Sharpe and Holland ?

 

It is surely in our best interest as a country to have only committed people in our arm forces, because only committed people are capable of defending our country from our enemies.

 

Report alleges that in 1999, Mr. Holland spoke at a convention of the German Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (NPD).

The following 2001 Financial Times report is of interests:

 

Ahmed Huber, a 74-year-old Swiss businessman and former journalist who converted to Islam in the 1960s, is a board member of Nada Management, a financial services and consultancy company which is part of the international Al Taqwa group. The US says this group has long acted as financial advisers to al-Qaeda.

Mr Huber, who is based in Bern, is known in Switzerland and Germany as an Islamic fundamentalist who attempts to forge links to far-right and neo-Nazi movements.

A spokesman for Germany's office for the protection of the constitution, the internal intelligence agency, said on Thursday that Mr Huber "sees himself as a mediator between Islam and right-wing groups". He also belongs to the revisionist movement, which believes the Holocaust did not take place, the spokesman said.

Klaus Beier, spokesman for the NPD, one of Germany's main far-right political parties, said Mr Huber has often addressed NPD events.

 

Also the U.S. Government has frozen Mr. Huber's financial assets according to the following report:

Al Qaeda's dollar pipeline takes some strange twists

In the past decade, according to Ahmed Huber, he has met operatives of Osama bin Laden several times at Islamic conferences around the world. But he describes as "ridiculous" U.S. charges that his Swiss-based company helped finance bin Laden's terrorism.

 

"I am not a terrorist," says Huber, one of several men

who serve on the management committee of Nada Management.
 

----------

Last week, American officials said the company is part of Al Taqwa, a group of investment-management operations in Europe that, they say, have "acted as financial advisers" to bin Laden's al Qaeda terrorist organization.

 

In a move to cut off bin Laden's money pipeline, Washington and its European allies shut down offices and froze the assets of Al Taqwa and a second, much larger financial network, the Dubai-based Al Barakaat Group.

 

The IRS closed eight Al Barakaat offices in the United States. Officials said the two financial networks operated in 40 countries.

 

"Al Taqwa and Al Barakaat raise funds for al Qaeda," President Bush declared. "They manage, invest, and distribute those funds."

Treasury Department officials say Al Barakaat and Al Taqwa arranged weapons shipments for terrorists. Officials of both financial networks deny the allegations.
 

-------


He [Huber] told U.S. News that he was introduced to bin Laden activists during Islamic conferences in London, Beirut, and Brussels, the last time in either 1997 or 1998.

 

The IHS Press website also presents names of founding distributists, among which is also Mr. Eric Gill. It is again amazing that such name is presented by supposedly Catholic publication agency IHS, as the research about Mr. Gill's pedophile and other sexual experiments, most of the time also involving his own family [sister and daughters !!!] takes this British founder of some later [rightly so] failed distributist villages into a category called criminal, which should be avoided by any honest and true Catholic. 

 

The IHS Press of course present itself as such, but in reality the background of distributism and the reasons why it is being spread among Catholics, is again much more visible to us, and less convenient, oh I'm sure now, to the people who support such "new revolutionary ideas".....

 

We have to also take a look at the already mentioned "former" Civic Institute of Prague director Mr. Michal Semin, about whom this website reported before.

 

Mr. Semin is running supposedly independent [from the Civic Institute]

Institute of St. Joseph. John Sharpe is also on the St. Joseph honorary board.

 

Mr. Semin is of course staunch supporter of distributism, like he, from among

most of these people, should be aware [and warn about] the clear communist background of this ideological nonsense called distributism.

 

It is not surprising at all that Mr. Semin is not doing so, based on his clear association with the Civic Institute, for over 11 years I have to add, which

again shows how Mr. Semin is either totally out of touch with the present

pro-communist and still Moscow controlled reality in the Czech Republic OR .......

 

One of the coincidental [I'm sure...] details on St. Joseph recently updated website is promotion of a seminar organized in Prague with the title: "Post-democracy: A threat or hope ?

 

According to St. Joseph website the seminar is being moderated by Vaclav Klaus himself, today president of the Czech Republic, alleged KGB cadre with supposedly Russian nationality background, real name allegedly Pruzhinskiy, with Russian born wife Livia Myshkin and family that came in 1937 to then democratic Czechoslovakia allegedly from Stalin's USSR [and therefore with the necessary NKVD-KGB blessing].

 

Mr. Semin is of course not reporting this to the Catholic faithful reading his website. Mr. Semin is only able to personally call me a liar [and comparing me to a communist STB agent] without offering any details about where on my website I lied about Mr. Semin and his highly questionable associations and connections to Civic Institute ?

 

Of course we can also ask why would a traditional Catholic, as Mr. Semin presents himself, promote such apologetic and pro-communist gathering on his website, leaving besides what pro-communist deceptive lies should be expected to hear in such "seminar" anyway...?

 

We will attempt to explain such details in the upcoming part called

Operation Wedge.

 

 

Conclusion

 

 

At the risk of being accused that this report is becoming too long I'd like

to present to you, dear readers, just couple more thoughts on distributism.

 

The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on property rights, as was reported, shows how such ideas of re-distributing ownership rights for the "common good" and

the "social justice" could turn ugly for the rightful owners - private citizens.

 

The headline shows it all:

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses -- even against their will -- for private economic development.

 

To make sure that the American people understand what this means,

I can point out to my personal - family experience when our land was confiscated by the communists in Czechoslovakia, as they also claimed they "know better" what the social justice is about.....

 

Beware of such people who promote distributism. Beware also of the strategic implications of such and related schemes, for it is the Devil himself behind them, using of course his servants, always ready to act and never tired to try yet another angle, another way to further the Devil's cause, and to bring such evil unto us.

 

The Ten Commandments tell us that we shall not steal nor covet our neighbor's property.

 

Yet the distributists are engaged in such ideology themselves. They want

some people to relinquish their property rights in order to satisfy the rest,

"less fortunate", with such, by social class envy fueled booty acquisition.

 

Is this what Jesus has thought about charity ?

 

Is this what we should teach our children from now on, that it is O.K. to take from those who have and give to those who don't have, by directive of some sort, as this part is always carefully guarded secret and the real true nature of distributism ?

 

When we look at the problems in the World, many of which are of the materialistic and communist making, why is the energy of the distributists involving a change of one free system of economics, just because some people, who now posses more than the others, have misused their fortunate abilities and betrayed the teachings of Christ ?

 

The Church structure is being hijacked for something sinister and we shall not stand and let that happen. Such people who support distributism are in clear violation of the Church doctrine and such people cannot possibly call themselves Catholics [and Christians].

 

But the behind the scenes moves and various connections of involved people are those facts that must not be overlooked.

 

The Murphy's law says that if things can go wrong they will go wrong.

 

Therefore it is again important to stand up and say so - what distributism is and what the agenda behind it is, and most of all whom does it serve the most....

 

God Bless America.

 

 

 

Back to top