The Enemies of Truth...

Written on the Feast of St. James the Apostle,

July 25, in the year of Our Lord 2008

Home

2nd Epistle of St. Paul to the Thessalonians 2 : 7 - 11

7 For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth,

do hold, until he be taken out of the way.
 

8 And then that wicked one shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill

with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming, him,
 

9 Whose coming is according to the working of Satan,
in all power, and signs, and lying wonders,

10 And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish;
because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying:

[Church note - 10 "God shall send"

... That is God shall suffer them to be deceived

by lying wonders, and false miracles,

in punishment of their not entertaining

the love of truth.]

11 That all may be judged who have not believed the truth,
but have consented to iniquity.

The truth will set you free....

In the age of denial of truth, as many deny the One Who is the Truth, and when also

history is perverted or manufactured by such enemies, one has to resort to either

accept it or oppose it.

But those who seek compromises in order, for them, not to be forced out of their laid back

relaxing mode of concupiscent lifestyle, which many such people live to the fullest, one has

to reconsider what is and what is not, in order that the What is Who is will not look in wrath

upon such who deny Him and Who He is, which is the truth.

Most polemics could be made by those who always seek to redefine terms in order, for them,

to fit their evil agenda or purpose, but such people have no desire nor room, in their evil

pursuits, for what in truth has to be truthfully and faithfully told, nor their rhetoric, however

it may appear inviting to some to consider, is worth of noticing and has to be, if discovered

not to be absolutely true, denied the light of the day.

It is essential, while we talk about this, to remember the words of the last Apostle St. John

the Evangelist, who, as the Holy Mother Church teaches, has written his Holy Gospel for

the purpose to oppose with truth the heretical lies which sprung by the enemies of Truth,

to warn those who would follow such devil's lies that either they will repent and amend

or they will have to pay the price, for such evil, to God....

The preface to the Gospel of St. John tells us the following [Douay-Rheims, 1912]:

By St. Polycarp, who knew the Beloved Disciple personally, St. Irenaeus was

informed that John instantly left the public bath-house in which he met the heretic

Cerinthus, with the words: "Let us flee hence !  The bath-house may fall upon us

since it harbors Cerinthus, the enemy of truth." 

In their vigorous pursuit of evil, such enemies don't dare to present any sign that would

show them as they are, but their continual compromises with evil acknowledge such fruits

themselves. Continual use of lies and deceits is therefore the practice of theirs, because if not,

the tree would begin to yield good fruits, which to such people is undesirable and

unthinkable....

It is essential to notice that while truth to such people has only marginal meaning, they in fact

labor in persuading others to such path, when in fact we are told that it is acceptable, well,

even necessary, to pertain to the "lesser evil", which we are to choose rather than the "greater

evil", out of these two evils, as these enemies of truth proclaim, we are to make compromises

and engage in dialog with the evil and openly erroneous side, if necessary [as they do often],

to set aside, in fact, what the truth is and to "see the other side's perspective"....

In this and other evils they perceive that it is acceptable to lean towards the "golden middle

road", like it was some kind of saving ground of sorts, while many of such people know well

that it is not what we pretend to be but what we are, that will yield us the fruits, either good or

bad, for it is not possible for a good tree to produce bad fruits and for an evil tree to produce

good fruits.....

But God knows His own well, He knows who His people are.

There is no way to accept any kind of evil - period !

We cannot possibly choose evil in order to do good, we cannot choose the "lesser" evil

because it is still evil, no matter how it is named, portrayed and defined, we cannot possibly

ever to concede to evil and we must never accept such heretical approaches which tell us to

do so, because we all be judged at the end by God for our works, for what we have done

and if you consent to evil, no matter what kind of good intent you have had, it is still evil,

it is a lie contra the truth, it is saying that to accept a lie is good, which is most evil....  

We are commanded by Our Lord to be perfect just as Our Father in Heaven is perfect - so

how can we accept evil, even when it comes from legitimate authority, when it is still evil,

and we are thus told not to be perfect in the eyes of God [not to strive to be so, to ask Him

for the grace to be made as such, to truly be in His image as He made us to be] but to accept

something God hates and something that is contrary to Him, which is of the devil, which is

not only a great evil and sin, but to promote such false doctrine is nothing but most hideous

and heretical deed itself.

I could be more specific, but that is not the purpose, for I have been specific before and

nothing has changed, but to be general in this, which to me means lot more than to encourage

the fleshly desires for "new things, new news etc." and the sensationalistic concupiscence

of those who read this solely for that purpose, but to show that the principle is not to change

just because those who should uphold it are not willing or will deny it to be done, thus

leading all who follow such a bad example towards the most unhappy end.

Yes, and such people seek balanced approaches and claim that radicalism is extreme and not

the cause which does proclaim the truth, which, what it means in fact is to unscrupulously tell

the truth and that's it, which is called to be extreme and radical, and this kind of principled

stand is to the contrary of what they stand for, but they themselves dare not say it about

themselves because their ways, that is as they are themselves, are not directed as such, for

when God is not giving His grace, and to His enemies He does not give grace, then they

themselves, sufficient only in lies, which their master Satan [yes, he himself !], supplies to

them in abundance, all mixed with partial truth so as to deceive those who are not yet in

such evil camp, but when such evil is accomplished and the evil fruits produced, those who

should say no, dare not say it, and many, out of their [spiritual and temporal] laziness find it

more practical or easier to follow, while their first thoughts should be to oppose it, and their

first action should be likewise to deny evil the space which it seeks....

While you may read this, it is not an accident that when we live in the last times, we are given

our last chance to either be on the side of good, which is God, or to be on the side of evil, which

is the devil. There is no other choice nor there ever will be.

If people decide to make compromises and find out, for the time being, such evil to be

profitable, it is only to their temporal, but not the eternal, happiness that this they do, for when

an account is rendered and the deeds of love towards God not recorded there, the words of

perdition will come and so many souls will perish as the result.

Our Catholic ancestors and countless martyrs are today turning over in their graves while their

happy souls bear witness in Heaven, while watching the rebirth of new Sodom and Gomorrha on this Earth, what kind of disaster it will bring on all those who will remain as they are and will not reform themselves, not only spiritually but in action, to oppose lies and evil

committed against God and His Church.

There is nothing personal, nor there ever was anything personal about it in this fundamental

fight, we are simply to say no and when evil approaches, as we are the children of God and

members of His Church, we have to defend God and His honor against His enemies, and we

have to defend His Church against all evil there is, without any compromises made - period.

If not, the wrath of God will fall upon us, as was illustrated by many examples in history, no

need to mention a few of them here.

As an example, let us say, to present the facts, we can show the ideas of perdition in true colors,

and bearing witness to the truth, in its own simplicity, we must say no to such lies and stand

firmly for the truth.

St. Paul foretells such times as we live in today, of which examples will be given shortly

[1 Timothy 4 : 1-2]:

1 Now the Spirit manifestly saith, that in the last times some shall depart

from the faith, giving heed to spirits of error, and doctrines of devils,

 

2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy, and having their conscience seared...

There is a question whether Catholics should resist authority.  Some even promote the idea

that we can never refuse obedience to legitimate leaders, citing the Syllabus of Errors of Pope

Pius IX, prop. 63, which forbids:

"It is lawful to refuse obedience to legitimate princes, and even to rebel against

them. " [quoted from encyclical Qui Pluribus, 1846].

The example of such error:

Q: How should a Catholic react to a government that is openly hostile to the Faith ?

 

"Yet resistance there must be, whenever the civil law contradicts the divine law or ecclesiastical law.....However, the resistance is passive and not active, provided that the governmental authority is legitimate.

 

For active resistance is armed combat against the government, and it is clearly taught by Pope Pius IX that Catholics may never rebel against legitimate leader...[Syllabus, Prop. 63].

It is all taken out of context, as will be explained shortly.

Does the state have the authority the meddle in public domain which belongs to faith and

morals ?

Would this great Pope Pius IX ever consider that such authority is in other than the Church

exclusive possession ?

Did Our Lord give or not the authority to teach only to the Apostles [His Church] or has He

given it freely to all, including the state [at the time it was the Pagan Rome and the heretical

Pharisees etc.] ?

Our Lord said that what is God's to give to God and what is Caesar's give to Caesar.

Faith and morals do not belong to be taught and ruled by Caesar, but by God's own

Church and His ministers.

Firstly, it is not permitted to refuse obedience to legitimate authority [and we here should also

take notice of the word 'princes', who are anointed as such by the Church, therefore the grace of

God is with such people when in lawful authority and they know what the Church authority is

and recognize it and always seek its guidance...], but it is not permitted to disobey God, Who's

laws come before obedience to any man....

Pope Pius IX made it absolutely clear in Qui Pluribus, point 22:

"Whoever resists authority resists the ordering made by God Himself,

consequently achieving his own condemnation; disobeying authority

is always sinful except when an order is given which is opposed

to the laws of God and the Church."

If then, when we are told that to rebel against legitimate authority is never permitted, in this

we are in fact told, if such case arises when such legitimate authority proclaims laws contrary to

the laws of God and His Church, that we must never resist this authority actively, implying, by

such used words, that Catholics are not revolutionaries and the opposition is passive and not

active, thus some say, leaving out the truth that when communist and atheistic governments,

like the one by Stalin backed and legitimately elected in Spain in 1936 for example, begins to

persecute Catholics and murder priests, religious and lay people just because they are true

in their True Faith, then such teaching [i.e.. to resist actively against such legitimate authority]

is not to be accepted because it is not the truth.

But the term 'to rebel' does not apply when we are doing something just and in accordance with God's justice, because then it is not a rebellion but upholding justice, which is not only highly commendable to do, but it is our duty towards God to do whenever He is wronged by His enemies.....

[Reference -  St. Thomas Aquinas - Summa Theologica - Whether vengeance is lawful ?]

Again, this is not being taught in full, which allows for errors and misleading and heretical

tendencies, specially in the light of the fact that Russian communist slavery is around the

corner....and communist agents have infiltrated the Church in substantial numbers...the

3rd Secret of Fatima is not a joke my dear friends, not a joke at all......

It is also being spread around the following error:

Q: How should a Catholic react to a government that is openly hostile to the Faith ?

....

Yet the Catholic is not a revolutionary, and must maintain his respect for 

legitimate authority even when it commands something immoral..... He may

[a Catholic], however, cease the special activity in question [implied in another

place - which is any kind of profession of Faith, Catholic charity etc. - ed. note],

in order to avoid the sanctions foreseen by law..... [1]

 

.....It is also permitted to cooperate with such unjust laws, provided that there is no

sin involved [...it hardly ever is, right ? - ed. note], if it were considered the lesser

evil and the most prudent thing to do.... "

This above acceptance of the "lesser evil" is completely contrary to the teaching of the Holy Mother Church and therefore heretical ! It is also a clear heresy to imply that we are allowed to compromise on our Apostolic Faith when "unjust laws" are passed by a "legitimate authority" and that it is permitted to us to accept such laws and orders from such authority, if "it were considered the lesser evil..."

We are not allowed to compromise on our Faith nor morals just because the "legitimate authority" does not embrace our Catholic Faith...and if such authority is a communist government, the most evil enemies of Christ and His Church, we are in fact told we can

never "rebel" [actively resist in Holy Crusade for example] against such legitimate authority....

This is a heresy, plain and simple.

To prove this is very easy.

One only has to read the Angelic Doctor and his Summa Theologica to realize that this above is a serious error, absolutely and completely refuted by St. Thomas Aquinas - and this should be known to those who claim the above contrary.

St. Thomas Aquinas says this:

Whether Five Expressions of Will Are Rightly Assigned to the Divine Will

[Pt. I, Q. 19 Art. 12, pt. 4]

 

[Ed. note - these 5 expressions of will are prohibition, precept, counsel, operation and permission.]

 

Objection 4:

 

Further, evil happens in more ways than good, since good happens in one way, but evil in all kinds of ways, as declared by the Philosopher (Ethic. ii. 6) [Ed. note - Aristotle is the Philosopher named by St. Thomas], and Dionysius (Div. Nom. iv. 22).

It is not right therefore to assign one expression only in the case of evil - namely,  prohibition - and two - namely, counsel and precept - in the case of good.

 

[Ed. note - again, please consider the above statement ".....It is also permitted to cooperate with such unjust laws, provided that there is no sin involved if it were considered the lesser evil and the most prudent thing to do.... "  - and that it is applied here in the objection #4 as a possibility of applied Divine Will, which we should strive to do and to fulfill.....!!!]

 

St. Thomas Aquinas replies in general to all 4 objections:

 

I answer that .... precept, counsel, and prohibition are called the will of God is

clear from the words of Matth. vi. 10: Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

That permission and operation are called the will of God is clear from Augustine

(Enchir. 95), who says: "Nothing is done, unless the Almighty wills it to be done, either by permitting it, or by actually doing it."

 

Reply to objection 4:

 

All evil of sin, though happening in many ways, agrees in being out of harmony with the divine will. Hence with regard to evil, only one expression is assigned, that of prohibition.

 

On the other hand, good stands in various relations to the divine goodness, since there are good deeds without which we cannot attain to the fruition of that goodness, and these are the subject of precept; and there are others by which we attain to it more perfectly, and these are the subject of counsel.

 

Or it may be said that counsel is not only concerned with the obtaining of greater good; but also with the avoiding of lesser evil.....

If this is not understood, you will just have to learn the hard way when you see God face to

face...that to compromise with evil is not permitted to us nor we are ever allowed to accept

any of it, and as the Apostle teaches [Eph. 4 : 14 -15 and 4 : 27]:

"That henceforth we be no more children tossed to and fro, and carried

about with every wind of doctrine by the wickedness of men,

by cunning craftiness, by which they lie in wait to deceive.

 

But doing the truth in charity, we may in all things grow up in him

who is the head, even Christ...."

---

"Give not place to the devil..."

In another place is also listed the means of legitimate defense of Catholic Faith, which,

leaving out the case when Catholic religion is being destroyed by a direct persecution, it is

not mentioned that Catholics are in fact dutifully obliged by the law of God to defend His

honor against His enemies in Holy War....and it is also implied by such, based on the fact

what these people leave out, that they don't consider it essential to salvation of souls,

whether such are in danger of being persecuted, the Church being destroyed, churches

desecrated by horrible sacrilege and people, the faithful and the priests, murdered by such

godless communist criminals in charge of the "legitimate authority"....

I am quite saddened that such people who dare to mislead the faithful and manhandle the

truth and mingle it with lies, do so, but if they knew communist methods first hand, and if

they had experience with communism and its satanic evil, they would not, I'm certain, unless

themselves also in the same evil camp, be involved in such evil committed against God.  

When the truth is being subverted into lies, and when facts and quotes are taken out of context,

to make certain that the lie sticks and the truth is no longer, then we are to act to the contrary

and reaffirm the affirmed.

I have written about the 3rd Secret of Fatima and I stand firmly behind what I have said. There

are within enemies of Our Lord, who do this evil on purpose, serving the Russian communist

cause and thus the master of all evil, the devil himself.

For if this was only ignorance on part of such people, they would have known long ago that

what they say is not the truth and the Holy Ghost assigning them the power of the keys and

correcting their errors [unless the evil of human free will - or the devil's directive instead] is

the contrary force leading such people away from God, when they are leading those under

their authority with them....it is not possible that ignorance should be assigned to such errors

and heretical statements, because of the Divine Promise that Our Lord is with His Church

always, and that the Paraclete, the always present Divine Guide, would not correct errors and

let those, who are not God's enemies [as it may seem if the reason for errors is only ignorance]

to continue in such heretical path and allow the faithful, the souls assigned to them to protect,

to be put in peril of eternal perdition.....

It is a grave sin, to lead the faithful by bad example, into error and heresy, knowingly, and

if we consider that such cases of "leaving out the whole truth" are today a daily routine, we

must never accept that this kind of evil activity is coincidental...it simply cannot be because

those who dare to cause it have to know the truth also....their office is the guarantee of what

they teach comes by the Power of the Holy Ghost....so while we know this and they know it,

it is evident that the Holy Spirit cannot possibly be with those who don't teach the whole

truth and leave it implied that only partial truth is sufficient to our salvation....

St. Thomas Aquinas teaches the following [part II - II, q. 3, art. 2, reply to obj. 2]:

"In cases of necessity where faith is in danger, everyone is bound to proclaim his

faith to others, either to give good example and encouragement to the rest of the

faithful, or to check the attacks of unbelievers; but at other times it is not the duty

of all the faithful to instruct others in the faith."

It is not the question of prudence, but what we do when immorality and heresy is promoted,

and when orders are given contrary to what the Church has always taught and what God has

revealed. In this case, I am not questioning anybody's authority, but the truth is not being told

and we are not being warned about this, and we are being prepared to do absolutely nothing

when much worse times come - and such times are around the corner.

I do resent the idea of "accepting the lesser evil" because when we accept any kind of evil, it is

no longer good we do, but we consent to iniquity, and as the Apostle teaches, we must not do

that :

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove

them. For the things that are done by them in secret, it is a shame even to speak of.

But all things that are reproved, are made manifest by the light; for all that is made

manifest is light.

The Epistle of St. Paul The Apostle to the Ephesians, 5 : 11-13

I want to make it clear again - it is not that such ideas are certainly in some cases true, when

we are to resist things opposed to faith passively [let us say by word only], but that the whole

truth is not proclaimed, what happens when such legitimate authority decides to order us,

by law, to seize or limit the practice of our true religion and what belongs to its outward

profession....and when such legitimate authority comes to arrest and persecute those who

would not obey such anti-Catholic orders or even laws, what is then the means to defend

the honor of God against such evil ?

If we are in position when there is no other possibility than to submit and let ourselves

be persecuted and imprisoned [for example], then we can be sure that we have done

accordingly, but if we knew about the dangers coming [and we were all warned about

Russian Communism and its methods of subversion and long-term plans to destroy, to

obliterate religion by all means], is it lawful in front of God not to be prepared to oppose

it and not to be ready to fight a holy war against such evil, while such "legitimate authority" has decided, by its adherence to such satanic evil communist ideology [either in secret for the present, and openly when successful in subverting the country], that we are not permitted to practice our Apostolic Catholic Faith at all, then what else are we to do than to fight such evil, even with weapons, in legitimate Holy Crusade ?

It is the teaching of the Church, I have mentioned it several times on this website. If you decide

to follow heretics and the enemies of truth, I don't quite understand how you can expect to save

your soul for God, while you know that those who will deny Our Lord, He will also deny them in front of His Father.

Let me give you more accurate example how evil this is, to teach, without fully explaining the

boundaries of supposedly prudence and thus teach the whole truth, how it is to be seen when

the Russian led communist evil comes - in secret as it is happening now [various KGB agents

and committed communists running several western governments including the United States

government etc.], and when fully ready, directly through Russian started WW3 and subsequent

world-wide communist enslavement.

Are we to accept such authority when it is a fully communist one, which in such case is no

authority at all because in its essence the lawful authority was stolen by such criminals in the

first place and they have usurp what was never meant for them to hold, only when God wants

to chastise us and destroy His enemies, then it is permitted, but are we still obliged to remain

passive when the laws of God and His Church are being destroyed by such "authority" ?

It is not possible to obey nor even recognize such authority as legitimate, which in its essence

and public ideological, moral, political and strategic military deeds and proclaimed goals,

or even in secret and through hidden ways, but of which we are warned in the Holy Bible, by

the Church and by Our Lady of Fatima - that is, about Russia and her subordinate communist

cohorts - such authority is the most evil, a sworn enemy of the Catholic Faith and the Holy

Mother Church, and it is out openly to eradicate it from the face of the Earth, to destroy thus

all possibility for the immortal souls to reach their Heavenly Home.....and this comes from

the devil, and we are in fact told thus to obey him as the "legitimate authority" and never to

rebel against him...!!!

His Holiness Pope Leo XII wrote the following:
 
The more grave the catastrophes threatening the flock of Jesus Christ, Our God and

Savior, the greater the solicitude that must be employed in preventing them by the

Roman Pontiffs, to whom the power to teach and govern and the protection of this

flock were entrusted in the person of St. Peter, prince of the Apostles.

For those who have been placed in the highest watch tower of the Church have the

mission to discern from afar the snares that the enemies of the Christian name have

prepared to exterminate the Church of Jesus Christ, a goal they will never achieve.

 

The Sovereign Pontiffs have the mission to denounce them and expose their

ruses to the faithful so that the latter can take care to avoid them and deny

their authority.

[(Quo graviora, n. 1, in Recueil des Allocutions Consistoriales, Encycliques et Autres Lettres Apostoliques Citées dans l’Encyclique Quanta cura et le Syllabus, Paris: Adrien le Clerc, 1865, p. 125) - quoted by Tradition in Action website]

There is no truth then in the statement that Catholics may never rebel against legitimate leader,

because when such leadership's authority is legitimate, but its deeds are anti-Catholic, its

authority is null and void at that precise moment and no longer can remain legitimate.

What is not explained here is what we are to do when the Catholic Faith is in danger, this is not

being fully declared, objectively assuming, for the purpose to register pacifism as valid form

of our practice of the Catholic Faith, which idea for this to be promoted comes from the Russian

communist camp [the spread of the fear of nuclear war combined with pacifism - Declaration

of the Russian organized Communist Conference in Havana, Cuba 1966].   [2]

Prelates who dare not teach the whole truth will have to answer for it to God, but it

is their God given authority which those who say it openly and truthfully lack, and thus,

the communist enemy of the Church is fully aware of this and those who promote such

evil know very well that those who see it have no authority to demand justice, only to

bear witness to the truth...which is done by this author also. 

For example, when we are told that we are to select the lesser of two evils, without even

explaining the gravity of such error, is it therefore lawful for us, in front of God, to accept a

law which would forbid us to condemn the evil practice of homosexuality and at the same

time force us to accept somebody among us who would be homosexual and promoting it ?

If the lesser evil is to allow somebody who openly perverts the flock by sinful example, how

can such rule of "lesser evil" ever be applied ?

How can somebody who is non-Catholic ever be accepted to be able to work in place which

embraces Catholic Faith, i.e. a Catholic church or Catholic organization, without the risk of

destroying the Faith and perverting the flock ?

How can this be proposed as possibility, not as a rule, but even as occasional practice, as it is

promoted by such people:

"It is also permitted to cooperate with such unjust laws, provided that there is no

sin involved, if it were considered the lesser evil and the most prudent thing to

do....

 

This could, perhaps, occasionally apply to the hiring of non-Catholics, but not as a

regular practice for Catholic charities and schools....."

And again, compare it with what St. Thomas Aquinas teaches and you have your

answer for the 3rd secret of Fatima:

All evil of sin, though happening in many ways, agrees in being out of harmony with the divine will. Hence with regard to evil, only one expression is assigned, that of prohibition.

 

On the other hand, good stands in various relations to the divine goodness, since there are good deeds without which we cannot attain to the fruition of that goodness, and these are the subject of precept; and there are others by which we attain to it more perfectly, and these are the subject of counsel.

 

Or it may be said that counsel is not only concerned with the obtaining of greater good; but also with the avoiding of lesser evil.....

 

It is essential to understand the gravity of this kind of error, because if we are to accept this we

will not be serving God and we will openly spit in every face [imagined to us in our still carnal

state] of every martyr in Heaven, for every martyr is a witness to the Truth in his act, not in prayer only and severe penance, but professed faith in deed.

Those who died as martyrs for Christ would then be diminished in stature, because, as we

are told now, it is permitted to cooperate with unjust laws [and even if it says if there is no sin

involved, how this can be foreseen and what if sin will be involved in future, when such error

is applied to our action and laws are applied in different interpretation than we have accepted

and followed ?]....

How can these enemies of truth, i.e. heretics and infidels and communists, how can they be

trusted to provide acceptable laws and never to dare to declare something contrary to God

and the teaching of the Church ?

Isn't there enough examples already that wicked laws are passed in every country of the world

and that the laws of God are set aside or disregarded in full ?

St. Thomas Aquinas quotes St. Augustine [ Pt. II - II, Q. 104, art. 5, Obedience

- Whether subjects are bound to obey their superiors in all things..?]:

"St. Augustine [De Verb. Dom. VIII]:

 

'If a commissioner issue an order, are you to comply,

if it is contrary to the bidding of proconsul ?

 

Again if the proconsul command one thing, and the emperor another,

will you hesitate to disregard the former and serve the latter ?

 

Therefore if the emperor commands one thing and God another,

you must disregard the former and obey God.'  
-----

St. Thomas Aquinas continues:

 

...in matters concerning the disposal of actions and human affairs,

a subject is bound to obey his superior within the sphere of his authority....[3]

And also, St. Thomas Aquinas states in the next question [Pt. II - II, q. 104, art. 6]:

Whether Christians are bound to obey the secular powers?

 

Objection 3. Further, men are not bound to obey robbers, who oppress them with violence. Now, Augustine says (De Civ. Dei iv): "Without justice, what else is a kingdom but a huge robbery?" Since therefore the authority of secular princes is frequently exercised with injustice, or owes its origin to some unjust usurpation,

it seems that Christians ought not to obey secular princes.

 

Reply to Objection 3.

 

Man is bound to obey secular princes in so far as this is required by order of justice. Wherefore if the prince's authority is not just but usurped, or if he commands what is unjust, his subjects are not bound to obey him, except perhaps accidentally, in order to avoid scandal or danger.

Since when has the state, any state, the authority to declare and demand anybody to obey

laws and codes immoral, unjust and all those contrary to the laws of God and His Church ?

There is no separation of church and state, for we are bound to obey God first before any man,

and so since God's true and only Church, the Catholic Church, was given the authority on earth

to bound what comes from God, and to teach, govern, sanctify and save all men, then if the

state orders something immoral, we must never obey and we must always reject it, if we don't

want to incur the wrath of God.... 

I'll ask you again - are you already so worldly and so perverted by evil, atheistic and heretical

lies that you don't know where and when to stop following it ?

And for the last, which is also essential, the following lie is being spread among the faithful by those who should teach otherwise [again, not questioning their authority but solely bearing witness to the truth]:

A new problem, though, is that since the end of the Cold War, no enemy of the United States possesses the means to resist American military power, and thus only "asymmetrical" attacks seem to be viable —terrorism against civilian targets, "cyber-war" against computer systems, etc. .... [ed. note - read this at the end of section "Modern Weapons"]

An excerpt of an article "Just War" written by Fr. Juan Carlos Iscara, SSPX, professor at

St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Winona, MN and originally published in the July 2002

issue of The Angelus....
 

Russia's WW3 ready, deep underground and fully staffed and protected 200 nuclear bunkers,

most advanced missiles and overwhelming superiority in number of nuclear warheads -

[Russia has estimated 17 thousand warheads, the United States is disarming and at the level

of 1500 warheads, smaller in yield also] that's the truth about Russian still communist WW3

military preparedness..... 

It is not me who's co-author of an anti-American propaganda book, alongside known Marxists

like Noam Chomsky, it is not me who's associated with pacifists, which is a clear heretical

approach, it is not me who has received the proven data and details about Russian communist

long-term plans and communist world-domination strategy and resolved not to warn our

fellow men about it, it is not me who has the teaching authority to tell the truth, the most sacred

duty towards God and His Church - and rather the contrary is done....and I can say more and

more and easily name names, but the essential remains - heretical, historical and factual lies

are being spread among the faithful instead of the only important thing - the truth !

St. Paul says the following [1 Thessalonians 5 : 1 - 5] - :

1 But of the times and moments, brethren, you need not, that we should write to you;

 

2 For yourselves know perfectly, that the day of the Lord shall so come, as a thief in the night.

 

3 For when they shall say, peace and security; then shall sudden destruction come upon them, as the pains upon her that is with child, and they shall not escape.

 

4 But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.

 

5 For all you are the children of light, and children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.

This above quote  from the article "Just War" is a lie [and I don't judge whether intentional or not - we are not allowed to judge intentions, only facts - which the above contradicts what Our Lady of Fatima and this website have already established as the genuine truth about Russian communist war preparations], and at the same time this is the affirmation of the 3rd secret of Fatima....and if you don't believe me, you will, you will believe it when you sit in one of those "friendly" Siberian Russian Bolshevik camps, without your family, without the sacraments and thus without God. 

Then you will know that you have believed such lies and consented to iniquity instead

of holding firm to the truth [Fatima Truth] and justice, for God and for the Church.  

The truth is the truth and it will set you free, unless you are binding yourselves to this wicked

world and want to obey it instead of obeying God first.

When the flock is perverted by lies and errors, heresies and such, no wonder God threatens

with chastisement, but those who are ready to oppose such Russian led communist evil

will be ready to fight it, with decisive action, actively as Catholic Holy Crusaders [not as

revolutionaries as suggested by some], because if not, if nothing is done to oppose it, lies will

rule the day, wicked laws will pervert the souls and God will punish not only those who let it

happen [as many are already His enemies from "their youth"], but also those who consented to

such evil by their apathy, indifference and their most wicked inaction at the end....

May Our Blessed Mother and Heavenly Queen guide your steps to salvation

and to do the right things for God and His Church.

In Christ and Mary

yours truly

Notes:

[1]

I would invite all to consider the heroic valor Spanish Catholics practiced when faced with

Russian backed and orchestrated communist takeover of Spain in 1936.

When for example we consider the case of the fortress Alcazar of Toledo, which was a military

academy, when the leading officer Colonel Don Jose Moscardo, despite orders from the

legitimate government in Madrid to load all ammunition from the nearby arms factory

and send it to the "popular front" [communists] militia and the Red military forces of the

pro-communist Stalin backed government, colonel Moscardo disobeyed such orders and

sent trucks to bring the ammunition inside the Alcazar, then declared state of war against

the tyrannical communist government and faced 10 weeks long overwhelming siege and

prevailed....when the forces of General Franco relieved the Alcazar Catholic patriots, as

Moscardo was a good and humble Catholic himself, the colonel made a report to General

Franco: "Nothing new in Alcazar..."

Moscardo was also ordered by the communist government to surrender all weapons but he

also refused...would that count as unlawful disobedience to legitimate authority based on

today standards ?

Pope Pius XI blessed this Holy Crusade and Pope Pius XII thanked General Franco and his

fellow crusaders personally when invited by the Pope to the Vatican after the Civil War ended.

Pius XII's speech to Gen. Franco is quite revealing....

I want to reaffirm here that extraordinary circumstances will arise when the Catholic Faith

is in direct danger, and then we all must pull together and defy those who will try to

destroy the Catholic Faith, we must be prepared in advance to resist, with weapons, and in

case of communist orchestrated civil war and then later on Russian led world-wide communist

takeover, we must oppose it and fight to the death and there is no way we can in any way

accept any unjust laws no matter if they do not at the moment force us to sin if we accept

them....

I have posted the Teaching of the Church, please read it again !

There is so many other Church sanctioned and approved cases of opposing legitimate

authority [which is misused and thus void, such authority, when doing evil against God and

His Church] which contradict clearly what is suggested about accepting even unjust laws, that

when this is left out and not explained, the Catholic faithful will think that it is O.K. to make

compromises with evil as long as nothing really serious is done, but what is not being taught

and explained is that while we make compromises, our enemies are ready and will not allow

us, if we remain unprepared to fight such evil, to have any opportunity to face this, for

example, the Russian communist evil in battle....

Russian communists have learned their extremely valuable lesson in Spain in 1936-39 period,

their subsequent communist propaganda portrayed the Crusade as "fascist" and "pro-Hitler"

illegitimate revolt, which ended by Franco's "tyrannical and anti-democratic" rule, which all is

nothing but a communist lie, precisely because Russians and their communist cohorts were

beaten by the Church and Her faithful Crusading forces - and this kind of example of true

Catholic resolve is not desirable by the Russian led communism because today, when they are

approaching the time of WW3 and subsequent communist slavery, th