- final analysis
February 26, 2006
For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son:
that whosoever believeth in him may not perish,
but may have life everlasting.
For God sent not his Son into the world,
to judge the world: but that the world
may be saved by him.
He that believeth in him is not judged.
But he that doth not believe is already judged:
because he believeth not
in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
And this is the judgment:
Because the light is come into the world and
men love darkness rather than the light.
For their works were evil.
For every one that doth evil hateth the light
and cometh not to the light,
that his works may not be reproved.
But he that doth truth cometh to the light
that his works may be made manifest:
because they are done in God.
[The Holy Gospel of St. John, 3 : 16 - 21]
Simplicity of the situation
Today the world is not safer or better off than before the so called collapse of communism occurred at the end of 1980s. It is absolutely clear today that the U.S. analysis of these events regarding the "collapse of Soviet communism" still hasn't changed and remains as flawed and erroneous as before.
Warnings from genuine defectors are disregarded or put aside as marginal, many of these warnings are ridiculed by the enemy agents within the media and government, critical facts are being covered up or simply remain unreported.
America simply doesn't believe that these Russian communists and their satellites are truly capable of creating this kind of far reaching anti-American and anti-West long-term strategy, it is simply inconceivable for the American mind to accept that such communist plan would exist and that the time has come for this Russian and Chinese communist evil to become a serious reality.
It all boils down whether America is truly capable of trusting these Russian communist criminals and their, to them of course meaningless and never binding, disarmament treaty signatures, or whether the national security has precedent over blindly [falsely] expected economic dividends "coming", but slowly and never for long, from these new markets opened by these "formerly communist" and now "democratic" regimes.
In our analysis, despite some voices who are concerned about the depth of such analysis and its "too far back going" approach, it is truly necessary to present these facts in order for us to recognize that our so called experts on Soviet Union and Russia may not be playing their part honorably, and could be serving these Russian, still communist, enemies of America instead.
1968 Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia
Based on the facts already presented in part 1 in part 2 of this analysis,
and also based on the true analysis presented by various defectors from communism, including among others, KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn and Czechoslovak General Jan Sejna, it is more than clear that the 1968 Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia was staged by the Russians themselves in order
to test the upcoming Perestroika fraud and also, no less important, it was meant to deceive the West into thinking that communism is "somehow" capable of reforming itself.
This indeed would be laughable if not so blindly accepted by the western
non-communist governments as principally possible and now historically acceptable.
It is also clear, as Condoleezza Rice is reporting in her book [1], that the Soviet leadership was in firm control of the situation throughout the KGB asset Dubcek's "1968 communism with human face" period, which signifies clearly, beyond any doubt, that this era of communism in Czechoslovakia cannot be in any shape or form called pro-democratic or freedom oriented.
Condoleezza Rice also assumes as true various claims of communist Czechoslovak officials, whom she gives full credit for "reporting"
about the Soviet led August 21, 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia:
General Dzur is said to have stated:
"We, too, were taken by surprise by the entry of the Allied forces.
It was around 2200 [10 pm] on 20 August [1968] when comrade Cernik phoned me from the Central Committee presidium and asked whether I knew what was happening along the border.
I knew the situation along the western border because I was responsible for that. But I did not known what the situation was elsewhere."
It is essential for the long-term Soviet policy to continue cover up the fact that this policy ever existed and that the so called liberalization process in 1968 Czechoslovakia was a major part of it.
Condoleezza Rice in her book portrays the situation as genuine and claims
over and over that the Soviet Union in fact had no choice but to act in case of
this Czechoslovak "democratization" to "counter" this "disunity" within the Soviet bloc...... Such clear nonsense and unfounded claim could not serve the communist deception better.
page 132
The involvement of the government at the expense of the
party for example threatened to change the basis of direct
Soviet-Czechoslovak military links.
--------
Links between the Soviet states and Czechoslovak nation were potentially more restrictive. The diminution of party control in the armed forces arguably could have weakened one means of Soviet influence.
Obviously any further movement toward apoliticization of the armed forces would have even more serious consequences.
Nor could the Soviets have looked with pleasure upon the awakening of long-dormant channels of communications
between the Czechoslovak political and military leaders.
Rapprochement of this type, at the expense of the Soviet Union,
was threatening. Soviet fears about the impact of events in the CLA [Czechoslovak People's Army] on the alliance were slowly confirmed as negative attitudes toward the Warsaw pact, already evident in the mid 1960s, exploded onto the surface. [2]
Condoleezza Rice also further down claims even more outrages theory of hers, that the Soviet bloc was "somehow slowly deteriorating" - all again based on these, by communist liars presented, statements to the fact.
... [this] discussion of Czechoslovak military doctrine was codified in two basic documents: the Action Program of the Ministry of Defense, which was prepared for the aborted Fourteenth Party Congress, and the memorandum of the Klement Gottwald [military] Academy staff.
-------
The report suggested that bilateral military assistance between Pact members - excluding the Soviet Union - might be valuable and should not be dismissed.
In fact, it was stated that the total reliance on the Soviet Union and the Warsaw pact was inadequate. [3]
In fact, Rice claims the same exact falsity over and over and her book,
using the same communists sources as the only people we should trust.
There's simply no way that Russians would allow the Soviet bloc satellites to separate and create any kind of independent military doctrine of their own.
Communism cannot prevail ever if disunity is allowed - and this
criminal Russian run regime has never allowed it to be even
contemplated or even be thought of.....
Those who would propose or even think about this kind of separation
from the communist unified code of World Communist Struggle, such
people are dealt with most severely - they are without any exception
liquidated.
It is not only impossible to accept that Rice didn't know this - it is clear
that she had to know and she lies instead.....
When people write a book about communist regime and its military
doctrines and structures, they don't use as true sources communists
and known KGB etc. agents working for the communist cause
[without explaining that such assertions of these sources must be
regarded as communist deception].
Rice has chosen to use such tainted sources and presents their
communist lies as what the only facts are - this put together with her
"USSR study years" and her ties to Josef Korbel, and most of all her
pro-Moscow and thus anti-American deeds [yet another disarmament
of America agreement between president Bush and the KGB criminal
Putin among others]- well, what else must happen before the
American people begin to see that the country's foreign policy has
been taken over by her Russian communist enemies ?
We could continue quoting from this book and bringing more details, namely Rice continues to play expert in the case of Poland and the 1978-1981 Russian staged crisis, involving the KGB-GRU project called Solidarity, but at this point it would be a waste of time. Rice continues to present the Soviet bloc for which
it is not - a disunited communist bloc that is bound to "collapse" under its own weight.
The today "newly apparent" arms race and military buildup of the "formerly communist" Soviet Union [pardon me - Russia] shows how such dangerous analysis of people with ties to various suspected pro-communist elements must not be allowed to continue inside the America's decision-making and policy centers.
Such a fraudulent and deceiving claim of Rice disregards the crimes of
communism, the overall communist ideology and the Soviet Bloc's full
commitment to it, and the vast use of political warfare and deception against
the West, and Rice's no doubt purposely misleading claims have therefore
no historical nor analytical value and cannot and must not be accepted as
valid. [4]
The timing of the publication of this book [1984] clearly shows what valuable
asset it is to the communist Russian Perestroika cause and how such a book,
full of communist deception and direct lies, can in a country not accustomed to
the communist deception and ways of life, as America is, bring someone like
Condoleezza Rice to her present high level position within the U.S. government
section responsible for America's national security and foreign policy....
Moscow couldn't be happier about such an achievement.....
The survival of freedom and of Christian values depends on full rejection
of any claim of disunity within the Soviet bloc, and on rejecting the clear
communist deception that the "collapse" of the communist tyrannical system
really occurred, and in accepting the reality that communism is simply unable
to reform itself, because what is based on crime, tyranny and oppression,
wants only to continue and therefore cannot be trusted, must be rejected on
principle and opposed with all ability and might.
Rice "expertise" regarding communism and America's national security
It is in the best interest of the Soviet - Russian communists that such "disunity"
within the bloc is accepted by the West as genuine because of the long-term
Soviet strategy and political warfare against the West, which depends heavily
on communist deception, disinformation, infiltration of the western
governments and intelligence services, and most importantly, such deadly
strategy relies on constant communist influencing of Western foreign policies
toward communism and the Soviet bloc.
Condoleezza Rice claims to be an expert on Soviet Union and Russia.
Her book not only suggests otherwise, it shows the willingness of Rice
to take so many communist deceptions and disinformation at their face value,
as if Russian and any other communists were "somehow", as Rice wants us to
believe, honest and trustworthy people.
It is simply not probable, also based on several serious issues regarding
clear pro-communist stand of Condoleezza Rice in her past and even
recently, that she would not have been approached by the KGB during
her 1978 "student visit" in Leningrad [5] in the Soviet Union, and even if we
accept the most improbable answer that Rice could have given to the KGB
officials regarding her potential cooperation - which would be a decline of her
services to the communist cause, the fact remains that when approached she
wouldn't have been given a choice but to cooperate or she wouldn't leave
the Soviet Union alive.....
This is simply how it works. People who are asked and dare to decline to
support the communist cause, such people simply disappear ...... period.
Her ties to Josef Korbel, Czechoslovak "defector" from communism and father
of Madeleine Albright, Rice publicly acknowledged friendship to Albright,
whose pro-communist deeds, namely allowing and enabling the North Korean
communists [subordinate to their Chinese and Russian bosses] to obtain
American plutonium, and many other examples of such treasonous behavior,
the overall result is that the worldwide communists strategy is enabled to
succeed - and these people are helping.
It is also clear that it cannot be coincidental when Rice in her recent deeds
only hampers America's foreign policy by not addressing the important issues
of Russia and China and their open military support of Islamic enemies of
America [Syria, Libya, Iran etc.], and at the same time Rice uses her U.S.
Government high level status to continue the American status quo ...... which
since the times of General George C. Patton never included any kind of
substantial and working strategy against communism.
One of the examples of this is the removal of Saddam Hussein's WMD
programs from Iraq to Syria by Russian special forces, under orders from
the Russian military intelligence GRU between January and March, 2003.
The Washington Times report [alternate link] is quite specific:
U.S. intelligence agencies have obtained satellite photographs of truck
convoys that were at several weapons sites in Iraq in the weeks before
U.S. military operations were launched, defense officials said yesterday.
The photographs indicate that Iraq was moving arms and equipment from
its known weapons sites, said officials who spoke on the condition of
anonymity. According to one official, the National Geospatial-Intelligence
Agency, known as NGA, "documented the movement of long convoys of
trucks from various areas around Baghdad to the Syrian border."
The official said the convoys are believed to include shipments ofsensitive armaments, including equipment used in making plastic
explosives and nuclear weapons. About 380 tons of RDX and HMX, used
in making such arms, were reported missing from the Al-Qaqaa weapons
facility, though the Pentagon and an embedded NBC News correspondent
said the facility appeared to have been emptied by the time U.S. forces
got there.
The photographs bolster the claims of Pentagon official John A. Shaw,who told The Washington Times on Wednesday that recent intelligence
reports indicate Russian special forces units took part in a
sophisticated dispersal operation from January 2003 to
March 2003 to move key weapons out of Iraq.
The same report also quotes Condoleezza Rice, then National Security Adviser
of the President Bush Administration:
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said in a interview on the
Laura Ingraham radio show that she [also] was not aware of the
information about Russian troops relocating Saddam's weapons
to Syria, Lebanon and possibly Iran.
Again, let us go back to the same report:
..... information indicates that Russian troops were directly involved
in assisting the Iraqi military and intelligence services to secure
and move the arms.
Documents reviewed by one defense official include specific
Russian military unit itineraries for the truck convoys.
The arms that were taken out of the country included missile parts,
nuclear-related equipment, tank and aircraft parts, and chemicals used
in making poison gas weapons, the official said.
Regarding the satellite photographs, defense officials said the
photographs bolster the information obtained from the European
intelligence services on the Russian arms-removal program.
The Russian special forces troops were housed at a computercenter near the Russian Embassy in Baghdad and left the country
shortly before the U.S. invasion was launched March 20, 2003.
Harold Hough, a satellite photographic specialist, said commercial satellite
images taken shortly before U.S. forces reached Baghdad revealed
Russian transport aircraft at Baghdad's international airport near a
warehouse.
Conclusion
We can of course find more and more details, but the question remains - how
long will America tolerate high treason and such a direct aid and comfort to
these communist terrorist enemies of America ?
How long can America afford to tolerate these treasonous crimes ?
The perception of real reality, when talking about fully committed communist
war machine, is missing in the American mind, so it is quite easy for the enemy
to implant and install inside America's governmental and analytical institutions
people who are not committed to America's defense and protection of her
freedom, but such people were no doubt recruited by the KGB and related
communist intelligence services to cause harm to America.
....by their fruits you shall know them......
After they are recruited and put to work, no matter on what pretenses
[money, ideological agreement with the communists, blackmail etc.],
these agents of influence are usually made aware by their controllers that
their services are no longer a question of choice but unchangeable directive
as long as these communist controllers see fit - and there's no escaping ......
Simply put, these agents of influence are made aware, and in selected timely
manner based on their psychological profile, that they are no longer only
"helping out the good cause" but became traitors to their country, and such
valuable blackmail tool will always be used against them anytime they decide
to betray and defect from the "worldwide communist struggle" ......
You can read more about the communist recruitment policies, and how
dangerous they are, but it all boils down to people's morals and behavioral
standards, which are directly connected to God and His Commandments.
Those who follow them, obey God and those who are charged by God
to watch over His flock, such need not fear.
On the other hand those who already betrayed God or deny Him, His divine
Son Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and His true Catholic teaching, such
and such heretics and infidels have to worry - for the devil's servants, the
communists, are always looking for people like that and are eager to use
their services to carry out their fight against God and His true flock.
Such a simple choice .....
May God's mercy lead you to salvation ..... for His
everlasting Honor and Glory.
In Christ and Mary
yours truly
Notes:
[1] Page 146:
Three days after Sejna's defection, however, Gen. I. I. Iakubovskiy, Commander in chief of the Warsaw Pact, arrived in Prague for discussions with Dubcek, Novotny, Lenart and Lomsky. [ed. note - Lomsky was the Minister of Defense, replaced by the Russians with Gen. Martin Dzur after Sejna defected - Rice doesn't detect this as important - again, not by coincidence....] Iakubovskiy remained Soviet's liaison with the Czechoslovak military throughout the crisis.
[2] This is just about the most outrageous claim Condoleezza Rice could make.
There were never any such threats to Soviet military doctrine from any Soviet bloc country. The only genuine situation that was ever threatening the Soviet rule and control of the block was the 1956 Hungarian uprising - but the Soviet tanks dispatched by Khrushchev took care of the situation.
Condoleezza Rice not only fails to recognize the historical context, she wants us, the readers, to accept this fallacy and to believe that "somehow" Russian communists would allow their satellites develop their own ways.....
[3] Condoleezza Rice is again using "the word of honor" of already, at the time
of her book publication [1984], uncovered STB communist agent Jiri Hodic,
born 02-22-1924, communist agent [STB Czechoslovak Secret Police], registered with the STB Headquarters [Prague], intelligence assignment
class - Agent, code name Dvorak, STB file # 2710, till his early 1980s totally unproblematic return to Soviet run Czechoslovakia personal secretary [in Austrian "exile"] of one of the main masterminds behind the KGB Perestroika fraud in Czechoslovakia Zdenek Mlynar - founding member of the KGB funded and controlled "dissident group" in Czechoslovakia Charter 77.
Mlynar, as a hard line communist, studied in Moscow during the Stalin era
- in the same class as Gorbachov (!!!), family Mlynar allegedly comes from
the USSR and came to then democratic Czechoslovakia in the 1920's.
Zdenek Mlynar was running the whole CZCP communist apparatus in 1968,
he also went to Moscow after the August 1968 Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and as Czechoslovak government official he signed
the agreement with Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev that the Soviet
occupation of Czechoslovakia was legal.
Mlynar "defected" [was sent abroad] to Vienna, Austria AFTER he signed Charter 77 proclamation in 1977, he became a professor at University of Innsbruck, Austria.
[4] To describe this more accurately we can read in the book We Will Bury You written by Czechoslovak general Jan Sejna, deputy Secretary of the Czechoslovak defense council till his defection in 1968 :
Page 110 - 111:
...we established study groups within the armed forces to analyze their cost effectiveness. The studies began early in 1965 and finished two years later. Their findings surprised no one in our Ministry.
----
from these findings emerged a number of bold proposals based on the fundamental premise that NATO was not an aggressive alliance and that it was inconceivable that the West would attack the Warsaw pact in the next fifteen to twenty years.
----
We also suggested a rationalization of military supply to avoid wasteful duplication. We were tired of producing weapons which the Russians rejected in favor of their own, often inferior, designs.
---
In June 1967, after prolonged discussion, a draft of these proposals went to the main military committee of the Ministry of Defense for endorsement. The Committee gave instructions that the Soviet leaders should be asked for their views.
I was a member of delegation, led by general Otakar Rytir, our Chief of Staff, which visited Moscow in October 1967.
Marshall Zakharov, Chief of Staff of the Red Army, opened the discussion and proceeded to reject our ideas point by point.
The atmosphere in the room was tick with hostility.
I broke out in a cold sweat when he announced that general Yepishev would deal with our "utterly inexplicable" belief that the West would not attack the Warsaw Pact.
There was absolute silence as the sinister and dreaded figure of this former deputy chief of the KGB leant forward on his elbows and looked as over with his cold snake-like eyes.
"It would be interesting to discover", he began in his usual soft conspiratorial tone, "who is the father of this anti-Marxist idea."
General Prchlik, our Chief of Main Political Administration, turned white. No one would meet Yepishev's gaze.
"Why, " he asked us, "do you want to destroy the ideological achievements of the past 30 years ? Why do you think the party has invested so much effort in alerting the people to the danger of Imperialist aggression ? How do you propose to explain to your people the need to be vigilant, to have a strong military capability,
if you assert that the West is no longer aggressive ?
Your proposal would destroy the whole basis of the Party's propaganda. "
"I strongly advise you, " he concluded ominously, "to launch an investigation into the origin of this idea. It was created either out of ignorance or under the influence of bourgeois ideology. "
There followed another two hours discussion before the meeting ended. We went back to Prague with our tails between our legs.
Quite a significant difference when we read the "expert works" of C. Rice
about the [never ever tolerated] disunity within the Soviet bloc....
[5] It is important for us to quote this mentioned Time Magazine article.
The original 2000 article [not this printer friendly version] was deleted by
the newspaper......
She traveled to Moscow last week to sell the Russians on the Bush Administration's National Missile Defense (NMD) plan, but Kremlin officials remained unswayed by U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice's policy arguments.
The Russian public was, however, entirely sold on Rice herself. Although she came bearing the White House's stark message that it intends to forge ahead with a "robust testing and evaluation phase" of NMD, even in possible violation of what it says are the outdated terms of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the visit of the
46-year-old Russia scholar was covered by an indulgent press.
The airwaves were full of praise for her "beautiful Russian," which she deployed in a one-on-one meeting with Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov. With frequent references to the time Rice spent studying in Soviet-era Leningrad, the trip was portrayed as a homecoming of sorts.
It would be interesting to find out the list of names of U.S. government officials, U.S. Senators and Representatives, defense, intelligence and State Department officials, and of course presidents, and compare their biographies with all available intelligence data to study the possibility whether these people could have been recruited by the Russian, Chinese etc. communist espionage [military or civilian] services.
To deny that such people exist, or to even decline to contemplate that their number could be substantial, will only allow the enemies of America to succeed. The era of HCUA [House Committee on Un-American Activities] should return and be taken extremely seriously.
We simply must remember that it is our freedom and faith that are in danger.
Those who don't see this as a valid concern will simply have to bare the horrible consequences of their inaction, apathy or indifference - and the time has come to face such reality......